i found the source E in question :
http://www.inesap.org/bulletin16/bul16art02.htm (at the bottom of
the page)
and i really want to say that i seriously think it is a sacarstic
remark. i'll tell you why
like if i was poor for example, n u do know that the indian ppl
have quite bad lives and they don't really support the gov alot,
like the facts that officials are corrupt and so forth, anyway, if
i were poor and had no basics, n the gov started building bombs
instead of giving me things like water. here my family is,
dehydrated and so forth. i would be angry. and i don't think i
would be proud when the gov priorities something as 'useless' as
bombs over the people of india. because bombs were not necessary in
the first place.
do you see my point?
